Things you should know about the supreme court judge
- She was the 103rd judge added to the bench on October 27, 2020.
- She replaced the notorious RGB
- Her religious beliefs will play a major role in any and all cases to be reviewed at the highest court in the nation.
- She decided that employers religious belief’s are more important than that of the employees
- She sided with the 7th court district of appeals in IL that exempted religious gatherings from covid-19 restrictions. Meaning you can’t have too many people in one place until you’re going to serve your god. In a sense saying that this is the ultimate privileged right. The right to religion, even in the face of a global pandemic.
- During the Obama admiration she added her name to a protest of the federal contraception mandate on the National Catholic register while she was a Professor of Law at Notre Dame. Don’t believe me, here’s an excerpt.
“The Obama administration has offered what it has styled as an ‘accommodation’ for religious institutions in the dispute over the HHS mandate for coverage (without cost sharing) of abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization and contraception. The administration will now require that all insurance plans cover (‘cost free’) these same products and services. Once a religiously affiliated (or believing individual) employer purchases insurance (as it must, by law), the insurance company will then contact the insured employees to advise them that the terms of the policy include coverage for these objectionable things.
“This so-called ‘accommodation’ changes nothing of moral substance and fails to remove the assault on religious liberty and the rights of conscience which gave rise to the controversy. It is certainly no compromise. The reason for the original bipartisan uproar was the administration’s insistence that religious employers, be they institutions or individuals, provide insurance that covered services they regard as gravely immoral and unjust. Under the new rule, the government still coerces religious institutions and individuals to purchase insurance policies that include the very same services.
“It is no answer to respond that the religious employers are not ‘paying’ for this aspect of the insurance coverage. For one thing, it is unrealistic to suggest that insurance companies will not pass the costs of these additional services on to the purchasers. More importantly, abortion drugs, sterilizations and contraceptives are a necessary feature of the policy purchased by the religious institution or believing individual. They will only be made available to those who are insured under such policy, by virtue of the terms of the policy.
3. Trump and his administration knew of her stance and politicized the replacement of RBG knowing damn well Roe v. Wade was on the docket.
The issue with Amy Coney Barett is that her presence alone on the bench has officially made it no better than the lower courts and seemingly a big joke. She could never fill the shoes of RGB.